Ispolzovanie organami konstitutsionnogo kontrolia zarubezhnogo opyta
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Ispolzovanie organami konstitutsionnogo kontrolia zarubezhnogo opyta
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
5-22
Abstract

This article is dedicated to comparative analysis f the use of foreign law by constitutional courts. The authors explore various factors that motivate judges to refer to foreign legal sources, categorize the goals o f citation, and provide a theoretical framework for judicial comparativism drawing on the theories o f constitutional interpretation.The main findings o f this analysis help to understand the Russian Constitutional Court's emerging practice o f explicit use of comparative arguments.

Keywords
constitutional adjudication, references to foreign law, goals of citation, legal system, theories of constitutional interpretation, Constitutional Court of Russia
Date of publication
01.08.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1165
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Alford R.P. In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism // UCLA Law Review. 2005. Vol. 52 

2. Halmai G. The Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation // The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law / Ed. by M. Rosenfeld, A. Sajo. Oxford, 2012. P. 1330.

3. McCrudden C. Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights // Comparative Law / Ed. By E. Orucu, D. Nelken. Hart Publishing, 2007. P. 372.

4. Saunders Ch. Judicial Engagement with Comparative Law // Comparative Constitutional Law / Ed. by T. Ginsburg, R. Dixon. Cheltenham, Northampton, 2011. P. 573.

5. Bryde B.-O. The Constitutional Judge and the International Constitutionalist Dialogue // Markesinis B., Fedtke J. Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law. New-York, 2006. P. 306.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate