RAS PresidiumОбщество и экономика Obshchestvo i ekonomika

  • ISSN (Print) 0207-3676
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5987

CURRENT TRENDS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CASH HOLDINGS IN RUSSIAN PUBLIC COMPANIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PRECAUTIONARY MOTIVE

PII
S30345987S0207367625090043-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034598725090043
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 9
Pages
47-57
Abstract
The author examines the specifics of asset management by Russian public companies in the context of financial constraints. Financial flexibility and liquidity of shares (their attractiveness) allow adjusting the capital structure. When access to debt capital markets is limited, financial flexibility is an indicator reflecting corporate policy in the field of financing business activities. Deviation from the target debt level requires subsequent adjustment of the capital structure to bring it closer to the optimal value. Liquidity of shares is a signal for investors and is determined by the value of the organization’s assets. High liquidity of shares makes it possible to create a monetary reserve for maintaining financial stability (solvency). Net capital (net worth) characterizes the state of internal reserves of the organization for maintaining its stable position; it is a factor determining the choice of financing option. Guided by a precautionary motive, Russian public companies save part of the monetary resources for their subsequent use as an investment component. The tight monetary policy of the Bank of Russia forces organizations to reduce their activity, abandoning investment projects. In the article, regression model is implemented based on the application of the Generalized Method of Moments (the Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data estimation procedure) to assess the management of monetary assets. The presented specification allows us to solve the problem of endogeneity (correlation of explanatory variables with an error in the model).
Keywords
денежные авуары финансовая гибкость ликвидность акций чистый капитал предупредительный мотив структура капитала финансовые ограничения
Date of publication
17.11.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
2

References

  1. 1. Луценко С.И. Инвестиции, ликвидность акций и качество управления // Стратегические решения и риск-менеджмент номер. 2024. № 4. С. 300–307.
  2. 2. Acharya V., Steffen S. The Risk of Being a Fallen Angel and the Corporate Dash for Cash in the Midst of COVID. Review of Corporate Finance Studies. 2020. Vol. 9. P. 430–471.
  3. 3. Amihud Y. Illiquidity and Stock returns: Cross-section and Time-series Effects. Working paper. Stern School of Business, New York University. 2000. P. 1–48.
  4. 4. Andres C., Doumet M., Fernau E., Theissen E. The Lintner model revisited: Dividends versus total payouts // Journal of Banking & Finance. 2015. Vol. 55. P. 56–69.
  5. 5. Barry C., Brown S. Differential Information and the Small Firm Effect // Journal of Financial Information. 1984. Vol. 13. P. 283–294.
  6. 6. Barry J., Campello M., Graham J., Ma Y. Corporate Flexibility in a Time of Crisis // Journal of Financial Economics. 2022. Vol. 144. P. 780–806.
  7. 7. Bates T., Kahle K., Stulz R. Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash than They Used To? // The Journal of Finance. 2009. Vol. 64. P. 1985–2021.
  8. 8. DeAngelo H., DeAngelo L., Skinner D. Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings // Journal of Financial Economics. 2004. Vol. 72. P. 425–456.
  9. 9. Fahlenbrach R., Rageth K., Stulz R. How Valuable is Financial Flexibility when Revenue Stops? Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis // Review of Financial Studies. 2021. Vol. 34. P. 5474–5521.
  10. 10. Frank M., Goyal V. Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure // Journal of Financial Economics. 2003. Vol. 67. P. 217–248.
  11. 11. Gamba A., Wang Z. Payout Dynamics. Working paper. Warwick Business School. 2024. P. 1–66.
  12. 12. Graham J., Harvey C. The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field // Journal of Financial Economics. 2001. Vol. 60. P. 187–243.
  13. 13. Holmstrom B., Tirole J. Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring // Journal of Political Economy. 1993. Vol. 101. P. 678–709.
  14. 14. Keynes J. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London. MacMillan. 1936. P. 403.
  15. 15. Leary M., Roberts M. Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structure? //Journal of Finance. 2005. Vol. 60. P. 2575–2619.
  16. 16. Leary M., Michaely R. Determinants of Dividend Smoothing: Empirical Evidence // The Review of Financial Studies. 2011.Vol. 24. P. 3197–3249.
  17. 17. Liu T., Shivdasani A. Financial Flexibility and Capital Structure. Working paper. Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina. 2018. P. 1–47.
  18. 18. Ramelli S., Wagner A. Feverish Stock Price Reactions to COVID-19 // Review of Corporate Finance Studies. 2020. Vol. 9. P. 622–655.
  19. 19. Skinner D. The evolving relation between earnings, dividends, and stock repurchases // Journal of Financial Economics. 2008. Vol. 87. P. 582–609.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library