Везде
To the question of a negotiation of falsification’ risk when using modern information and communication technologies on elections
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
To the question of a negotiation of falsification’ risk when using modern information and communication technologies on elections
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Kseniia Matrenina 
Edition
Issue 8
Pages
100-104
Abstract
In this article the author proves a relevance of application of electronic voting methods on elections and analyzes possible situations of falsification of election’s results when using modern information and communication technologies. The author investigates the use of the state automated system "Elections ”, the optical scan voting system (KOIB in Russian) and the complex for electronic voting in the Russian electoral process, reveals protective properties of the system and the complexes from a falsification of voting’s results. The author analyzes the measures directed to a negotiation of the risk offalsification of election’s results in the territory of such states as Brazil, the USA, the Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland (for instance, testing the machines for electronic voting). The author proposed the recommendations for removal the risk of a falsification.
Keywords
the state automated system “Elections ”, the optical scan voting system, the complex for electronic voting, electronic voting, election, information and communication technologies, falsification, the electronic voting system, Internet, testing
Date of publication
01.08.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1349
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Golychev A.A. Ehlektronnaya demokratiya kak faktor povysheniya politicheskogo uchastiya grazhdan sovremennoj Rossii. Diss.... kand. polit. nauk. M., 2006. S. 6 
 
 2. Matejkovich M.S. Zaschita izbiratel'nykh prav grazhdan v Rossijskoj Federatsii: problemy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. diss.... doktora yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2003. S. 13 
 
 3. Goldsmith B., Ruthrauff H. Implementing and overseeing Electronic voting and counting technologies. USA: The National Democratic Institute, 2013. P. 260 
 
 4. Selker T. Ehlektronnoe golosovanie: kak optimizirovat' protsess provedeniya vyborov // V mire nauki. 2005. № 1. S. 64. 
 
 5. Titovskaya N.V. Ehlektronnoe tajnoe golosovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitel'no-pravovoj analiz // Yurid. nauka. 2012. № 4. S. 108.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate