Везде
THE STRUCTURE OF THE FIELD OF ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITS OF PUBLIC
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE STRUCTURE OF THE FIELD OF ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITS OF PUBLIC
Annotation
PII
S086904990000616-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Petr Orekhovsky 
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
5-23
Abstract
The paper is devoted the sociological background of broad economic discussions. In the spotlight are the economic topics that seem to be most important for the reference groups – government, business, media and foreign colleagues. Problems that may be deemed important and relevant scientifi c community itself, displaced to the periphery of economic knowledge. For researchers who are engaged in topics that go beyond the interests of reference groups do not recognize the right to challenge. This situation is typical not only unorthodox economic theories, but also for liberalism and the mainstream. As a consequence, the results of economic discussions have relatively little impact on the development of society.
Keywords
reference groups, scientific revolution, the right to challenge, structure of the field of economics
Date of publication
03.02.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1015
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Abel' Eh., Bernanke B. Makroehkonomika. SPb., 2008.
 Al'ber M. Kapitalizm protiv kapitalizma. SPb., 1998.
 Auzan A.A. Obschestvennyj dogovor: vzglyad iz 2009 g. (http://polit.ru/article/2009/05/25/ auzan/).
 Batchikov S., Glaz'ev S., Kara-Murza S. Belaya kniga. Ehkonomicheskie reformy v Rossii 1991–2001. M., 2002.
 Bessonova O. Instituty razdatochnoj ehkonomiki Rossii: retrospektivnyj analiz. Novo- sibirsk, 1997.
 Bessonova O. Razdatok: institutsional'naya teoriya khozyajstvennogo razvitiya Rossii. Novo- sibirsk, 1999.
 Bessonova O. Razdatochnaya ehkonomika Rossii: ehvolyutsiya cherez transformatsii. M., 2006.
 Burd'e P. Pole intellektual'noj deyatel'nosti kak osobyj mir // Burd'e P. Nachala. M., 1994.
 Gurvich E.T. Dolgosrochnye perspektivy rossijskoj ehkonomiki // Ehkonomicheskaya politika. 2013. № 3.
 Gurvich E.T., Kudrin A.L. Starenie naseleniya i ugroza byudzhetnogo krizisa // Voprosy ehko- nomiki. 2012. № 3.
 Dal' R. Poliarkhiya: uchastie i oppozitsiya. M., 2010.
 Illarionov A. Slovo i delo // Kontinent. 2007. № 134; 2008. № 136.
 Kordonskij S. Pomestnaya federatsiya. M., 2010.
 Kordonskij S. Rynki vlasti. Administrativnye rynki SSSR i Rossii. M., 2000.
 Kordonskij S. Soslovnaya struktura postsovetskoj Rossii. M., 2008.
 Koshovets O. Ehkspert i vosproizvodstvo nauchnogo znaniya // Ehkonomika kak iskusstvo: meto- dologicheskie voprosy primeneniya ehkonomicheskoj teorii v prikladnykh sotsial'no-ehkonomiche- skikh issledovaniyakh. M., 2008.
 Krauch K. Strannaya ne-smert' neoliberalizma. M., 2012.
 Krugman P. Kredo liberala. M., 2009.
 Merton R. Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura. M., 2006.
 Rajnert Eh. Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bed- nymi. M., 2011.
 Tilli Ch. Demokratiya. M., 2007.
 Federal'nyj byudzhet 2014–2016 gg. – byudzhet tormozheniya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya (so- kraschennyj variant nezavisimoj ehkspertizy, osuschestvlennoj Tsentrom finansovykh issledo- vanij Instituta ehkonomiki RAN). Ehkspertiza vypolnyalas' gruppoj nezavisimykh ehkspertov pod rukovodstvom Tsentra finansovykh issledovanij IEh RAN prof. V.K. Senchagova dlya Komi- teta po byudzhetu i nalogam Gosudarstvennoj dumy RF // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki RAN. 2014. № 1.
 Shmatko N.A. “Nauchnaya revolyutsiya” v ehkonomike // Simvolicheskaya vlast': sotsial'nye nauki i politika. M., 2011.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate