Везде
Foundations of nominal classifications: from semantics to phonology
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Foundations of nominal classifications: from semantics to phonology
Annotation
PII
S0373658X0002018-8-1
DOI
10.31857/S0373658X0002018-8
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Nina Sumbatova 
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
7-30
Abstract

In this paper, I discuss some difficult cases of description and interpretation of grammatical gender (nominal class). In typology, gender systems are often classified into those exclusively based on the meaning of the nouns (semantic gender) and those taking into account their formal, primarily morphological properties. Analyzing the gender system of Dargwa, I am trying to show that at least part of the gender systems that are usually viewed as semantic, are really based on the properties of the referent of the corresponding NP. I am also trying to figure out whether there are gender systems where the gender of a noun is unambiguously determined by its formal properties. In particular, I describe a very radical case of a gender system, the system of Landuma (Mel, Guinea), where the agreement rules seem to be based on the phonological structure of the controlling noun.

Keywords
agreement, Dargwa, gender, Landuma, Mel languages, noun class, Principle of Phonology-Free Syntax
Acknowledgment
The research is supported by RSF grant No. 17-18-01184. I express my sincerest gratitude to the colleagues, who helped to find some gaps and correct some mistakes in this paper: P. M. Arkadiev, V. F. Vydrin, A. A. Kozlov, L. S. Kozlov, Denis Creissels, Yu. A. Lander as well as anonymous reviewers of “Voprosy Jazykoznanija”.
Received
25.11.2018
Date of publication
26.11.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
637
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Andronov 1987 — Andronov M. S. Grammatika tamil’skogo yazyka. [Grammar of Tamil.] Moscow: Nauka, 1987.

2. Koval’ 1997 — Koval’ A. I. Nominal categories in Fulah. Osnovy afrikanskogo yazykoznaniya. T. 1. Imennye kategorii. Vinogradov V. A. (ed.). Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1997. Pp. 92–220.

3. Lander 2015 — Lander Yu. A. Ob otsutstvii imennoi klassifikatsii v tantynskom darginskom [On the absence of nominal classification in Tanty dialect of Dargwa]. A report at the conference on Oriental languages. Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, January 27, 2015.

4. Makeeva, Shluinsky 2015 — Makeeva N. V., Shluinsky A. B. Noun classes and agreement in Akebu. Issledovaniya po yazykam Afriki. No. 5. Vinogradov V. A. (ed.). Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2015. Pp. 174–200.

5. Toporova 1994 — Toporova I. N. Grammatika yazyka lingala [Lingala grammar]. Moscow: Pomovskii i Partnery, 1994.

6. Aikhenvald 2002 — Aikhenvald A. Y. Classifiers. A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.

7. Aikhenvald 2017 — Aikhenvald A. Y. A typology of noun categorization devices. The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Aikhenvald A. Y., Dixon R. M. W. (eds.). Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017. Pp. 361–405.

8. Bao Diop 2015 — Bao Diop S. Les classes nominales en nyun gunyamolo. Les classes nominales dans les langues atlantiques. Creissels D., Pozdniakov K. (eds.). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe, 2015. Pp. 371–406.

9. Chumakina 2012 — Chumakina M. Archi. Talk at the University of Harvard, Cambridge, Mass., USA. 28th November 2012.

10. Cobbinah 2010 — Cobbinah A. The Casamance as an area of intense language contact. The case of Baïnouk Gubaher. Journal of Language Contact (Thema) 3. 2010. Pp. 175–201.

11. Corbett 1991 — Corbett G. G. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.

12. Corbett 2006 — Corbett G. G. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006.

13. Dahl 2000 — Dahl Ö. Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. Gender in grammar and cognition. I: Approaches to gender. Unterbeck B. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 2000. Pp. 99–116.

14. Dimitriadis (ms.) — Dimitriadis A. Alliterative concord in phonology-free syntax. (Ms.) Univ. of Pennsylvania, 1996.

15. Dobrin 2012 — Dobrin L. M. Concreteness in grammar. The noun class systems of the Arapesh languages. Stanford Studies in Morphology and the Lexicon. Stanford: CSLI publications, 2012.

16. Hockett 1958 — Hockett C. F. A course in modern linguistics. Language Learning. 1958. Vol. 8. No. 3–4. Pp. 73–75.

17. Makeeva, Shluinsky (ms.) — Makeeva N., Shluinsky A. Noun classes and class agreement in Akebu. (Ms.)

18. Miller et al. 1997 — Miller Ph., Pullum G., Zwicky A. The Principle of Phonology-Free Syntax: Four apparent counterexamples in French. Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 33. 1997. Pp. 67–90.

19. Rogers (ms.) — Rogers K. Landuma grammar write-up: Noun classing system. (Ms.) 2008.

20. Sande 2016 — Sande H. An interface model of phonologically determined agreement. Proceedings of the 33rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Kyeong-min Kim et al. (eds.). Somerville (MA): Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2016. Pp. 339–350.

21. Sande 2017 — Sande H. Phonologically determined agreement in Guébie. UC Berkeley Phonetics and Phonology Lab Annual Report (2017). 2017.

22. Segerer 2015 — Segerer G. Les classes nominales en manjaku. Les classes nominales dans les langues atlantiques. Creissels D., Pozdn iakov K. (eds.). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe, 2015. Pp. 183–208.

23. WALS — The World Atlas of Language Structures: http://wals.info.

24. Zwicky 1969 — Zwicky A. M. Phonological constraints in syntactic descriptions. Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 1. Issue 3. 1969. Pp. 411–463.

25. Zwicky, Pullum 1986 — Zwicky A. M., Pullum G. K. The Principle of Phonology-Free Syntax: Introductory remarks. The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 32. 1986. Pp. 63–91.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate