Везде
The main approaches to the management of state property in the context of modern challenges
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The main approaches to the management of state property in the context of modern challenges
Annotation
PII
S020736760020580-7-1
DOI
10.31857/S020736760020580-7
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Gribanova 
Affiliation: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
29-37
Abstract

The article presents the results of a study of the Russian reform in the context of modern challenges. The emphasis is placed on the increasing role of the state in solving current and long-term problems. It is shown, that successful solutions and the capability of obtaining the planned results depend on conceptual approaches to the management of state property, without which the state will not be able to perform its functions.

Keywords
public administration, state property management, Russian liberal reform, modern challenges
Date of publication
24.06.2022
Number of purchasers
11
Views
406
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Ivanchenko I.S. Novyj neomerkantilizm kak vyzov dlya globalizirovannoj ehkonomiki // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2021. № 9. S. 132-148.

2. Reinert E.S., Reinert S.F. (2011). Mercantilism and the future: The future lives of an old philosophy // International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. Vol. 6. No. 1. R. 131-143.

3. McMichael P. (2013). Land grabbing as security mercantilism in international relations // Globalizations. Vol. 10. No. 1. R. 47-64.

4. Veselov D.A., Yarkin A.M. Institutsional'nye izmeneniya, neravenstvo i dolgosrochnoe ehkonomicheskoe razvitie: teoriya i ehmpirika // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2022. № 1. S. 47-71.

5. Dombrovski M.P. 30 let ehkonomicheskikh reform na postsovetskom prostranstve: makroehkonomicheskie protsessy // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2022. № 2. S. 5-32.

6. Ribas S. KGB apokalipsis / 2-e izd. // M.: Veche. 2022. 480 s.

7. Tadelis S., Williamson O. Transaction Cost Economics. // Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network Scholarly Paper, Mart 12, 2012.

8. Abalkin L.I. Chestnost' kak ehkonomicheskaya kategoriya // M.: IEh RAN. 1999.

9. Bratchenko S.A. Metodologicheskie aspekty ehffektivnosti upravleniya gosudarstvennym imuschestvom // Zhurnal ehkonomicheskoj teorii. 2020. T. 17. № 1. S. 17-32.

10. Grinberg R.S., Rubinshtejn A.Ya. Individuum & Gosudarstvo: ehkonomicheskaya dilemma // M.: Ves' mir. 2013.

11. Orekhovskij P.A. Kritika nravstvennykh osnovanij normativnoj ehkonomiki // M.: IEh RAN. 2014. 44 s.

12. B'yukenen Dzh. Sochineniya // M.: «Taurus-Al'fa». 1997.

13. Kozlova S.V. Upravlenie gosudarstvennym i munitsipal'nym imuschestvom: smozhet li novyj zakon preodolet' institutsional'nye lovushki? // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2019. № 5. S. 24-42.

14. Olson M. The logic of collective action / In: C. Calhoun, J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff, I. Virk (eds.). Sontemporary sociological theory, 3 ed. // Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 1965. R. 124-128.

15. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Political losers as a barrier to economic development //American Economic Review. 2000. Vol. 90. No. 2. R. 126-130.

16. Reinert E.S., Reinert S.A. Mercantilism and economic development: Schumpeterian dynamics, institution building, and international benchmarking // Oikos. 2011. Vol. 10. No. 1. R. 8-37.

17. McMichael P. Land grabbing as security mercantilism in international relation // Globalizations. 2013. Vol. 10. No. 1. R. 47-64.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate