Abstract
The author criticizes main thesis of A. Orlov's article «From theory of cost of Marks to new economic conception of search of laws of economy in nature». He shows their historic and logical unsoundness and practical uselessness. The comparative analyses of proposed postulates of energetic theory of cost and corresponding Marks's categories leads to following conclusion: there is one more unsuccessful attempt to find a substitute to the theory of work cost which explicates the real mechanism of market economy and capitalist exploitation of man by man.
Comments
No posts found