Везде
RELATIONSHIP OF ADOLESCENTS'' PERSONAL PECULIARITIES WITH EVERYDAY USE OF COMPUTER
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
RELATIONSHIP OF ADOLESCENTS'' PERSONAL PECULIARITIES WITH EVERYDAY USE OF COMPUTER
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000596-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
TATIANA RIPPINEN  E. Slobodskaya
ORCID: 0000-0003-2076-0691
Abstract
The structure of adolescents' behavior at the computer and its correlations with personal peculiarities are described in the article. The study was conducted in a sample of 993 adolescents (ranging 14-18 years). Personality characteristics of adolescents were measured by the Inventory of Child Individual Differences. The study showed that the behaviour of teenagers at the computer has a multidimensional structure. A significant proportion of the variance of computer use is explained by five factors; intensity is crucial to use a computer. The individual style of behaviour is also determined by the content of computer use: fascination with computer games, using simple and advanced applications and virtual communication. It was determined that desire for virtual communication is associated with positive emotionality, sociability, organization, activity, complaisance, empathy, achievement motivation, openness to experience, low level of shyness and antagonism. Teens who spend a lot of time at the computer, in network games and virtual communication are characterized by unconsciousness, obstinacy, and emotional stability. Teens, characterized by the set of personality traits like sociability, activity, low levels of shyness and timidity, stubbornness, antagonistic, distractibility, disorganization and lack of desire for achievements are at risk of excessive use of computer and game addiction.
Keywords
Personality traits, five-factor model of personality traits, extraversion, consciousness,openness, inventory of child individual differences. (icid), computer use, internet, virtual communication, computer games, network games, social networks, teens, canonical correlation analysis, factor analysis, neuroticism, intransigence
Date of publication
03.07.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
649
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Babaeva Yu.D., Vojskunskij A.E. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v obuchenii i v razvitii odarennykh detej i podrostkov//Novye tsennosti obrazovaniya. 2006. T. 3. № 27. S. 136-149.
    2. 

  2. Belinskaya E.P. Informatsionnaya sotsializatsiya podrostkov: opyt pol'zovaniya sotsial'nymi setyami i psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie//Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. T. 6. № 30. URL: http://psystudy.ru.
    3. 

  3. Vojskunskij A.E. Razvivaetsya li agressivnost' u detej podrostkov, uvlechennykh komp'yuternymi igrami?//Voprosy psikhologii. 2010. № 6. S. 133143.
    4. 

  4. Knyazev G.G., Slobodskaya E.R. Pyatifaktornaya struktura lichnosti u detej i podrostkov (po dannym roditelej i samootsenki)//Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. № 6. S. 69-77.
    5. 

  5. Sobkin V.S., Adamchuk D.V. Shkol'nik i informatsionno-kommunikatsionnye tekhnologii: vozrastnye osobennosti i regional'no-povelencheskaya spetsifika//Sotsiokul'turnye transformatsii podrostkovoj subkul'tury: Trudy po sotsiologii obrazovaniya. T. XI. Vyp. XX/Pod red. V.S. Sobki-na. M.: Tsentr sotsiologii obrazovaniya RAO, 2006. C. 84-115.
    6. 

  6. Sobkin V.S., Evstigneeva Yu.M. Podrostok: virtual'nost' i sotsial'naya real'nost'. M.: Tsentr sotsiologii obrazovaniya RAO, 2001. T. VI. Vyp. X.
    7. 

  7. Brandtzazg P.B., Heim J., Karahasanovic A. Understanding the new digital divide -a typology of Internet users in Europe//International Journ. of Human-Computer Studies. 2011. V. 69. № 3. P. 123-138.
    8. 

  8. Caspi A., Roberts B.W., Shiner R.L. Personality development: Stability and change//Annual Review of Psychology. 2005. V. 56. P. 453-484.
    9. 

  9. Eysenck H.J. Personality and the experimental study of education//European Journ. of Personality. 1996. V. 10. R. 427-439.
    10. 

  10. Halverson C.F., Havill V.L., Deal J. et al. Personality structure as derived from parental ratings of free descriptions of children: The Inventory of Child Individual Differences//Journ. ofPersonality. 2003. V. 71. P. 995-1026.
    11. 

  11. Kalmus V., Realo A. and Siibak A. Motives for internet use and their relationships with personality traits and socio-demographic factors//Trames. 2011. V. 15. № 4. P. 385-403.
    12. 

  12. Kraut R., Kiesler S., Boneva B. Internet paradox revisited//Journ. Soc Issues. 2002. V. 58. P. 49-74.
    13. 

  13. McCrae R.R., Terracciano A., 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005. V. 89. P. 407-425.
    14. 

  14. Morahan-Martin J., Schumacher P. Attitudinal and experiential predictors of technological expertise//Computers and Human Behavior. 2007. V. 23 № 5. P. 2230-2239.
    15. 

  15. O'Connor B.P. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test//Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 2000. V. 32 № 3. P. 396402.
    16. 

  16. Ozer D.J., Benet-Martinez V. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes//Annual Review of Psychology. 2006. V. 57. P. 401-421.
    17. 

  17. Peter J., Valkenburg P.M. Adolescents' Internet use: Testing the "disappearing digital divide" versus the "emerging digital differentiation" approach//Poetics. 2006. V. 34. P. 293-305.
    18. 

  18. Roberts B.W., Kuncel N., Shiner R., Caspi A., Goldberg L.R. The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes//Perspectives in Psychological Science. 2007. V. 2. P. 313-345.
    19. 

  19. Sherry A., Henson R.K. Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer//Journal of Personality Assessment. 2005. V. 84. № 1. P. 37-48.
    20. 

  20. Slobodskaya H.R., Zupaniii M. Development and validation of the inventory of child individual differences -Short version in two slavic countries//Studia Psychologica. 2010. V. 52. № 1. P. 23-39.
    21. 

  21. Steinberg L., Morris A.S. Adolescent development//Annual Review of Psychology. 2001. V. 52. P. 83110.
    22. 

  22. Subrahmanyam K., Kraut R., Greenfield P., Gross E. The impact of home computer use on children's activities and development//The Future of Children. 2000. V. 10. № 2. P. 123-144.
    23. 

  23. Swickert R.J., Hittner J.B., Harris J.L., Herring J.A. Relationships among Internet use, personality and social support//Computers in Human Behavior. 2002. V. 18. № 4. P. 437-451.
    24. 

  24. Van der Aa N., Overbeek G., Engels R., Scholte R., Meerkerk G., Eijnden van den R. Daily and compulsive Internet use and well-being in adolescence: A diathesis-stress model based on Big Five personality traits//Journ. Youth Adolescence. 2009. V. 38. P. 765-776.
    25.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate