CONSUMERS’ COMMENTS ON PROTEST ACTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE YOUTUBE SEGMENT
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
CONSUMERS’ COMMENTS ON PROTEST ACTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE YOUTUBE SEGMENT
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
127-133
Abstract
The paper examines the nature of online discussions on the problems of perception of the authorities and the opposition. An analysis if effected of comments to the documentary film “Anatomy of protest” and “Anatomy of protest-2” on pages YouTibe network service that provides video hosting. It is concluded that at the moment the online discussion does almost not affect the course of democratization of Russian society, however, they serve as a test in analyzing relationships of groups of citizens to various processes in the Russian society.
Keywords
politics, protest potential, political participation, the government, the opposition, Internet
Date of publication
01.06.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
465
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya ehpokha: ehkonomika, obschestvo i kul'tura / Per. s angl. M.: GU VShE, 2000.

Kozhevnikova O.V., Kulagina E.A. Iskrennost' v otvetakh respondentov o politicheskikh predpochteniyakh // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2008. № 2(86).

Ksenofontova I.V. Rol' Interneta v razvitii protestnogo dvizheniya // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2012. № 3(109).

Makhmudov T.A. Iskrennost' i politika – “dve veschi nesovmestnye”? // Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. 2011. № 3(18).

Men'shikov I.L., Kudryavtsev A.G. Obzor sistem analiza tonal'nosti teksta na russkom yazyke // Molodoj uchenyj. 2012. № 12.

Myagkov A.Yu. Iskrennost' respondentov v massovykh oprosakh: dis. ... dokt. sotsiol. nauk. Ivanovo, 2003.

Semenov E.E. Virtual'naya setevaya paradigma politicheskoj aktivnosti // Vlast'. 2013. № 4.

Titov V.V. Politicheskaya samoidentifikatsiya i modeli protestnogo povedeniya pol'zovatelej runeta (po materialam kontent-analiza sotsial'nykh setej “VKontakte” i Facebook) // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2013. № 2(114).

Ushkin S.G. Novaya virtual'naya oppozitsiya: kto ona? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 9.

Khazeeva N.M. Sotsial'nye media: VoxPopuli ili spetsifika novogo kanala izucheniya mneniya potrebitelej // Onlajn issledovaniya v Rossii 3.0. M.: Izdatel'skij dom “Kodeks”, 2012.

Bae Y., Lee H. Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: Measuring the positive or negative influence of popular twitterers // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012. Vol. 63. № 12.

Bollen J., Mao H., Zeng X.-J. Twitter mood predicts the stock market // Journal of Computational Science. 2011. № 2(1).

Campbell S.W., Kwak N. Political Involvement in “Mobilized” Society: The Interactive Relationships Among Mobile Communication, Network Characteristics, and Political Participation // Journal of Communication. 2011. Vol. 61. № 6.

Castells M. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity, 2012.

Comunello F., Anzera G. Will the revolution be tweeted? A conceptual framework for understanding the social media and the Arab Spring // Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations. 2012. Vol. 23. № 4.

Conroy M., Feezell J.T., Guerrero M. Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement // Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 28. № 5.

Dahlberg L. Democracy via cyberspace: Mapping the rhetorics and practices of three prominent camps // New Media & Society. 2001. № 3(2).

Eirinaki M., Pisal S., Singh J. Feature-based opinion mining and ranking // Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 2012. № 78.

Eveland W.P., Hively M.H. Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation // Journal of Communication. 2009. Vol. 59. № 2.

Eveland W.P., Morey A.C., Hutchens M.J. Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective // Journal of Communication. 2011. Vol. 61. № 6.

Farrell H. The Consequences of the Internet for Politics // Annual Review of Political Science. 2012. Vol. 15.

Freelon D.G. Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication // New Media & Society. 2010. Vol. 12. № 7.

Gonzalez-Bailon S., Kaltenbrunner A., Banchs R.E. The structure of political discussion networks: a model for the analysis of online deliberation // Journal of Information Technology. 2010. Vol. 25. № 2.

Halpern D., Gibbs J. Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression // Computers in Human Behavior. 2013. Vol. 29. № 3.

Halverson J.R., Ruston S.W., Trethewey A. Mediated Martyrs of the Arab Spring: New Media, Civil Religion, and Narrative in Tunisia and Egypt // Journal of Communication. 2013. Vol. 63. № 2.

Hanson G., Haridakis P.M., Cunningham A.W., Sharma R., Ponder J.D. The 2008 Presidential Campaign: Political Cynicism in the Age of Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube // Mass Communication and Society. 2010. Vol. 13. № 5.

Hardy B.W., Scheufele D.A. Examining differential gains from Internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions // Journal of Communication. 2005. № 55(1).

Kavada A. Engagement, bonding, and identity across multiple platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace // MedieKultur. 2012. № 52.

Malouf R., Mullen T. Taking sides: User classification for informal online political discourse // Internet Research. 2008. № 18.

Miao Q., Li Q., Zeng D. Fine-grained opinion mining by integrating multiple review sources // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010. № 61.

Mihelj S., van Zoonen L., Vis F. Cosmopolitan communication online: YouTube responses to the anti- Islam film Fitna // British Journal of Sociology. 2011. Vol. 62. № 4.

Mossberger K., Tolbert C.J., McNeal R.S. Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

Mostafa M.M. More than words: Social networks’ text mining for consumer brand sentiments // Expert Systems with Applications. 2013.Vol. 40. № 10.

Moy P., Gastil J. Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions // Political Communication. 2006. № 23(4).

Mutz D.C. The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation // American Journal of Political Science. 2002. № 46.

Mutz D.C. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Pang B., Lee L. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis // Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval. 2008. Vol. 2. № 1(2).

Peretti J., Micheletti M. The Nike Sweatshop Email: Political Consumerism, Internet, and Culture Jamming // Politics, Products, and Markets.Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. L.: Transaction Publishers, 2004.

Putnam R.D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American democracy. NY: Simon & Schuster, 2000.

Rojas H., Puig-i-Abril E. Mobilizers Mobilized: Information, Expression, Mobilization and Participation in the Digital Age // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009. Vol. 14. № 4.

Shah D.V., Cho J., Nah S., Gotlieb M.R., Hwang H., Lee N.J., Scholl R.M., McLeod D.M. Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model // Journal of Communication. 2007. Vol. 57. № 4.

Sunstein C. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Thelwall, M., Buckley K., Paltoglou G. Sentiment in Twitter events // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011. № 62(2).

Zhou L., Chaovalit P. Ontology-supported polarity mining // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007. Vol. 59. № 1.

Zuckerman A.S. The Social Logic of Politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2005.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate