References

Additional sources and materials

Borisyuk V. Prezidentskaya kampaniya 2000 g. v SShA: krizis partijnoj identichnosti // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2001, № 3. S. 84-95.
 Soedinyonnye Shtaty Ameriki: Konstitutsiya i zakonodatel'stvo. Pod red. O.A. Zhidkova. Perevod V.I. Lafitskogo. M.: Progress, Univers, 1993. -766 s.
 Travkina N.M. Uroki arifmetiki po-floridski // SShA ❖ Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2001, № 7. S. 61-79.
 Federal'nye vybory 2000 goda v SShA / Otv. red. N.G. Zyablyuk. Moskva: ISKRAN, 2001, 166 s.
 Adkins E. Randall, Kent A. Kirwan, What Role Does the "Federalism Bonus" Play in the Presidential Selection? Publius.Oxford University Press. Vol. 32, No. 4, The State of American Federalism, 2001-2002 (Autumn, 2002) p. 71-90/
 Agresti A, Presnell B., Misvotes, Undervotes and Overvotes: the 2000 Presidential Election in Florida // Statistical Science. Vol. 17. 2002. № 4. R. 436-440.
 Arrington S. Theodore and Brenner Saul. Should the Electoral College be Replaced by the Direct Election of the President? A Debate. Political Science & Politics. Vol. 17, No. 2, (Spring, 1984). P. 237-250.
 Borisyuk V. U.S. Presidential Compaign of 2000: Party Identity Crisis // World Economy and International Relations. 2001, No. 3, 84-95 p.
 Campbell E. James. The American Campaign. Texas A&M University Press, 2000. 314 p.
 Conrad G. Frederick, Benjamin B. Bederson, Brian Lewis et. al, Electronic voting eliminates hanging chads but introduces new usability challenges// International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2009. № 67. P. 111.
 Dudley L. Robert. The Contemporary Presidency: The Presidential Election of 2000: a Great Civics Lesson? / Presidential Studies Quarterly, September 2001, vol. 31. Issue 3. P. 505-513.
 Electronic Voting Eliminates Hanging Chads But Introduces New Usability Challenges / International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2009. № 67. R. 111-124.
 Erikson S. Robert. The 2000 Presidential Election in Historical Perspective / Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 116, No. 1 (Spring, 2001). P. 29-52.
 Federal Elections 2000 in the U.S.A. Ed. By N.G. Zjabljuk. Moscow, 2001. 166 p.
 Hansen E. Bruce Recounts from Undervotes: Evidence From the 2000 Presidential Election // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2003. Vol. 98. No. 462. P. 292-298.
 Jasanoff Sheila. Election 2000: Mechanical Error or System Failure? / Social Studies of Science. Vol. 31, No. 3 (Junuary, 2001). P. 461-467.
 Miller H Arthur, Klobucar F. Thomas. The Role of the Issues in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election // Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 33, No. 1, 2000 Presidential Election (March 2003). P. 101-124.
 Miller M. Geralyn. Methodology, Statistics, and Voting Error: An Exploration of 2000 Presidential Election Data in Two States.// Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 33. Issue 1. P. 1-13.
 Montjoy S. Robert. The Public Administration of Elections // Public Administration Review. Volume 68, Issue 5, (September-October 2008). P. 788-799.
 The New Crisis. Presidential elections: has duplicity overcome democracy Nov/Dec 2000. Vol. 107. Issue 6. P. 10.
 Posner A. Richard. The 2000 Presidential Election: A Statistical and Legal Analysis. // Supreme Court Economic Review. Vol. 12 (2004). P. 1-40.
 Saad Lydia. Americans call for term limits, end to Electoral College/ Gallop Poll. January 18, 2013. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/159881/americans-call- term-limits-end-electoral-college.aspx (accessed 16.09.2016).
 Travkina N.M. Florida's Lessons in arithmetics // USA ❖ Canada - Economics- Politics-Culture. 2001. No. 7, p. 61-79.
 New Crisis. Nov/Dec 2000 Vol. 107. Issue 6. P - 10 U.S.A.: (the) Constitution and Legislation Ed. by O.A. Zhidkov. Translated by V. J. Lafitsky. Moscow: Progress, Univers, 1993. U,S, News and World Report. 9/27.09.2004. Vol. 137. Issue 10. P. 30.
 Wise R. Charles. Election Administration in Crisis: An Early Look at Lessons From Bush Versus Gore. Public Administration Review, Vol. 61, No. 2 (03. -04.2001). P.131-139.