SOCIAL LIBERALISM: AN ANALYSIS OF THE POSITION OF THE AUSTRIAN SCHOOL
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
SOCIAL LIBERALISM: AN ANALYSIS OF THE POSITION OF THE AUSTRIAN SCHOOL
Annotation
PII
S086904990000616-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
64-74
Abstract
The article contains the critical examination of Grinberg–Rubinstain's concept of economic sociodynamics and patronized goods from the position of liberal doctrines of the Austrian school. It reveals von Mises theory of history, where ideas occupy the central place and interests are pro- derivatives from them. It is shown that the notion of “public interest” is a dominant public opinion, which, of course, cannot exist as something separate from the individuals. Public interest – not necessary represents something positive and ensuring progress. The public interest may be aimed against it. And outside public opinion it simply does not exist. Patronized goods with the exception of pure public goods become not because they have need in such the state, but because the state and interest groups need to take care of them. The state constrains free entrepreneurship, which only can provide effi cient delivery of the most of the patronized goods. And the state is ineffective supplier of these goods. In general social liberalism from the perspective of the Austrian economic theory is presented as a new wave of statism.
Keywords
economic sociodynamics, patronized goods, theory of history, ideas, public interest, public opinion, statism
Date of publication
03.02.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1045
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1 Error 523 origin is unreachable

References



Additional sources and materials

Burakovskij A.M. Bojnya 1939–1945. Ne Vtoraya Mirovaya, a Velikaya Grazhdanskaya. M., 2014.
Grinberg R.S., Rubinshtejn A.Ya. Individuum i gosudarstvo: ehkonomicheskaya dilemma. M., 2013.
Zapretit' finansirovanie futbol'nykh klubov iz gosudarstvennogo byudzheta. 2013 (URL: https://www.roi.ru/1896/).
Kapelyushnikov R.I. Povedencheskaya ehkonomika i novyj paternalizm: preprint WP3/2013/03. M., 2013.
Mizes L. fon. Byurokratiya. Zaplanirovannyj khaos. Antikapitalisticheskaya mental'nost'. M., 1993.
Mizes L. fon. Vsemoguschee pravitel'stvo: total'noe gosudarstvo i total'naya vojna. Chelya- binsk, 2006.
Mizes L. fon. Teoriya i istoriya: interpretatsiya sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoj ehvolyutsii. Che- lyabinsk, 2007.
Mizes L. fon. Chelovecheskaya deyatel'nost': traktat po ehkonomicheskoj teorii. Chelyabinsk, 2005.
Myuller D. Obschestvennyj vybor III. M., 2007.
Nikolajchuk A. Pol-Ameriki – za legalizatsiyu marikhuany (URL: http://rus.ruvr.ru/ 2011/10/18/58940504.html).
Obschestvennoe mnenie – 2013. Ezhegodnik. M., 2014.
Rotbard M. Predislovie // Mizes L. fon. Teoriya i istoriya: interpretatsiya sotsial'no- ehkonomicheskoj ehvolyutsii. Chelyabinsk, 2007.
Sehj Zh.-B., Bastia F. Traktat po politicheskoj ehkonomii (Zh.-B. Sehj). Ehkonomicheskie so- fizmy. Ehkonomicheskie garmonii (F. Bastia). M., 2000.
Tallok G. Obschestvennye blaga, pereraspredelenie i poisk renty. M., 2011.
Ukrainskij krizis: dejstviya rukovodstva Ukrainy i Rossii. Press-vypusk Levada-Tsentra 18.08.2014 (http://www.levada.ru/12-08-2014/ukrainskii-krizis-deistviya-rukovodstva-ukrainy-i-rossii).
Uehrta de Soto Kh. Sotsializm, ehkonomicheskij raschet i predprinimatel'skaya funktsiya. M., Chelyabinsk, 2008.
Uehrta de Soto Kh. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskaya teoriya dinamicheskoj ehffektivnosti. Chelya- binsk, 2011.
Tsifra dnya. Igroki kiprskikh klubov v 16 raz deshevle rossijskikh. 22.08.2014 (URL: http:// www.sovsport.ru/gazeta/article-item/737601).
Khajek F. Kapitalizm i istoriki. Chelyabinsk, 2012.
Khyul'smann J.G. Poslednij rytsar' liberalizma: zhizn' i idei Lyudviga fon Mizesa. M., Chelyabinsk, 2013.
Buchanan J.M., Musgrave R. A Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge, 2000.
Drag War Statistics, 2012 (URL: http://www.drugpolicy.org/drug-war-statistics).
Hoppe H.-H. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. London, 1989.
McCloskey D.N. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago, 2010.
McCloskey D.N. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago, 2006.
Niskanen W.A. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Cheltenham, 1994.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate