Везде
Infinitive Сomplement Сlauses in Old Russian
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Infinitive Сomplement Сlauses in Old Russian
Annotation
PII
S0373658X0005707-6-
DOI
10.31857/S0373658X0005707-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anna Pichkhadze 
Affiliation: Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 4
Pages
72-84
Abstract

The paper describes how infinitive clauses attached by subordinating conjunctions functioned as sentential complements in Old Russian. Semantic and syntactic properties of predicates which governed this peculiar Old Russian construction as well as means of its connection to the matrix clause are discussed. It is shown that in Old Russian, infinitive clauses attached by subordinating conjunctions as sentential complements were more or less regularly governed by mental purpose predicates and commissives. The subject of the matrix predicate expressed by a verb of purpose or a commissive was referentially identical to the subject of the infinitive clause. Purpose predicates and commissives governed the same construction because they are semantically close: commissives serve to express purpose verbally through a speech act. In the late 13th century, the earliest examples are attested of demonstrative pronouns used as correlatives in matrix clauses that governed infinitive clauses attached by subordinating conjunctions. The use of correlatives allowed matrix predicates of different lexical-semantic classes to combine with infinitive clauses attached by subordinating conjunctions.

Keywords
commissives, conjunctions, infinitive, Old Russian, subordination, sentential arguments, syntax
Acknowledgment
The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 16-18- 02095), provided via Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Received
02.09.2019
Date of publication
02.09.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
813
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0373658X0005707-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 02.07.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Vajan 1952 — Vajan A. Rukovodstvo po staroslavyanskomu yazyku. M.: Izd- vo inostrannoj literatury, 1952. [Vaillant A. Rukovodstvo po staroslavyanskomu yazyku [A manual on Old Slavonic]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Inostrannoi Literatury, 1952.]

2. Vlasova 2014 — Vlasova E. A. Infinitiv i soslagatel'noe naklonenie v kosvennoj rechi v russkikh letopisyakh XI–XVI vv. Russkij yazyk v nauchnom osveschenii, 2014, 27(1): 185–205. [Vlasova E. A. Infinitive and subjunctive in indirect speech in Russian chronicles of 11th–16th centuries. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2014, 27(1): 185–205.]

3. Zhivov 2017 — Zhivov V. M. Istoriya yazyka russkoj pis'mennosti: V 2 t. T. I. M.: Universitet Dmitriya Pozharskogo, 2017. [Zhivov V. M. Istoriya yazyka russkoi pis’mennosti: V 2 t. T. I. [History of language of the Russian literary texts: In 2 vol. Vol. I. Moscow: Dmitry Pozharsky Univ., 2017.]

4. Knyazev 2009 — Knyazev M. Yu. Predikatnye aktanty s mestoimeniem «to» v russkom yazyke: grammaticheskij status i osobennosti upotrebleniya. Diplomnaya rabota. SPb.: Sankt- Peterburgskij gos. un- t, 2009. [Knyazev M. Yu. Predikatnye aktanty s mestoimeniem «to» v russkom yazyke: grammaticheskii status i osobennosti upotrebleniya [Complement clauses with the pronoun to in Russian: Grammatical status and usage patterns]. Graduate thesis. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State Univ., 2009.]

5. Pekelis 2014 — Pekelis O. E. Infinitiv vs. pridatochnoe s soyuzom chtoby: k voprosu o vybore sposoba oformleniya sententsial'nogo aktanta v russkom yazyke. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2014, 4: 13–45. [Pekelis O. E. Infinitive vs. čtoby- clause: Choosing the strategy of sentential argument marking in Russian. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2014, 4: 13–45.]

6. Tagirova 2003 — Tagirova R. G. Naklonenie namereniya glagola v sovremennom bashkirskom yazyke. Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Ufa: Bashkirskij gos. ped. un- t, 2003. [Tagirova R. G. Naklonenie namereniya glagola v sovremennom bashkirskom yazyke [Purposive mood in Modern Bashkir]. Ph.D. diss. abstract. Ufa: Bashkir State Pedagogical Univ., 2003.]

7. Legate 2010 — Legate J. A. On how how is used instead of that. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2010, 28: 121–134. URL: https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~jlegate/nllt28.pdf

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate