Везде
Towards a typology of Classical Armenian nominal paradigms: Instr.Pl
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Towards a typology of Classical Armenian nominal paradigms: Instr.Pl
Annotation
PII
S0373658X0001060-5-
DOI
10.31857/S0373658X0001060-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir Plungian 
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991; 119019
Xenia Semionova
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
103-118
Abstract

The paper discusses the morphological status and the origin of instrumental plural form in Classical Armenian. This form is typologically unique in two ways: first, it is the only segmentable form within the flective declensional paradigms in Classical Armenian, which consists of the instrumental case marker and a separate plural marker -k‘; second, this plural marker occupies a peculiar linear position after the case marker (and not before it, unlike in all standard agglutinative declension patterns). It is argued that the notion of “decumulation” can account for some properties of Classical Armenian declension; a hypothesis of late clitic origins of the plural marker within the form in question is also discussed.

Keywords
agglutination, Classical Armenian, cumulation, declension, flection, paradigm
Received
17.10.2016
Date of publication
17.10.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
543
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0373658X0001060-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 19.09.2018
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Belyaev 2014 — Belyaev O. I. Ossetic as a language with a two-case system: Suspended affixation and other paradoxes of case marking. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2014. No. 6. Pp. 31—65.

2. Jahukyan 1967 — Jahukyan G. B. Ocherki po istorii dopis’mennogo perioda armyanskogo yazyka [An outline of the history of pre-literate Old Armenian]. Erevan: The Academy of Sciences Publ., 1967.

3. Jahukyan 1982 — Jahukyan G. B. Sravnitel’naya grammatika armyanskogo yazyka [A comparative grammar of Armenian]. Erevan: The Academy of Sciences Publ., 1982.

4. Zaliznyak 1967/2002 — Zaliznyak A. A. On plural markers in the Russian declension. Zaliznyak A. A. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie (s prilozheniem izbrannykh rabot po sovremennomu russkomu yazyku i obshchemu yazykoznaniyu). Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2002. Pp. 545—549.

5. Zaliznyak 1973/2002 — Zaliznyak A. A. On the interpretation of the term «case» in linguistic descriptions. Zaliznyak A. A. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie (s prilozheniem izbrannykh rabot po sovremennomu russkomu yazyku i obshchemu yazykoznaniyu). Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2002. Pp. 613—647.

6. Kibrik 2003 — Kibrik A. E. Noun inflection in the Dagestanian languages with typological parallels. Kibrik A. E. Konstanty i peremennye yazyka. St. Petersburg Aleteiya. Pp. 196—269.

7. Krylov 1997/2002 — Krylov S. A. A. A. Zaliznyak’s «Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie» 30 years later: An attempt of a retrospective review from the perspective of neostructuralist morphology. Zaliznyak A. A. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie (s prilozheniem izbrannykh rabot po sovremennomu russkomu yazyku i obshchemu yazykoznaniyu). Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2002. Pp. 699—748.

8. Makaev 1967 — Makaev E. A. The importance of Armenian for the Proto-Indo-European reconstruction. Istoriko-filologicheskii zhurnal. 1967. No. 4. Pp. 75—90.

9. Plungian 2009 — Plungian V. A. Obshchaya morfologiya: vvedenie v problematiku [General morphology: Introduction to the problematics]. 3rd ed. (revised and enlarged). Moscow: Librokom, 2009.

10. Plungian 2011 — Plungian V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: Grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira [Introducing grammatical semantics: Grammatical values and grammatical systems in the world’s languages]. Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities, 2011.

11. Semionova 2010 — Semionova X. P. Evolyutsiya padezhnoi sistemy drevnearmyanskogo yazyka: osnovnye tendentsii i problemy opisaniya. Diplomnaya rabota [Evolution of the Classical Armenian case system: Main tendencies and problems of description. Graduate thesis]. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State Univ., 2010.

12. Tumanyan 1971 — Tumanyan E. G. Drevnearmyanskii yazyk [The Classical Armenian language]. Moscow: Nauka, 1971.

13. Jakobson 1958/1985 — Jakobson R. O. Morphological observations on the Slavic declension. Jakobson R. O. Izbrannye raboty. Moscow: Progress, 1985. Pp. 176—197.

14. Bybee 1985 — Bybee J. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1985.

15. Caha 2009 — Caha P. Classical Armenian declension. Nordlyd. 2009. Vol. 36. (Special issue on Nanosyntax.) Pp. 77—112.

16. Clackson 1994 — Clackson J. The linguistic relationship between Armenian and Greek. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

17. Clackson 2008 — Clackson J. Classical Armenian. The ancient languages of Asia Minor. Roger D. Woodard (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Pp. 124—143.

18. Donabédian 2000 — Donabédian A. De l’arménien classique à l’arménien moderne: typologie, ordre des mots et contact linguistique. Cahiers de linguistique de l’INALCO. 2000. No. 3. Pp. 34—54.

19. Enger 2013 — Enger H.-O. Morphological theory and grammaticalisation: The role of meaning and local generalisations. Language Sciences. 2013. Vol. 36. Pp. 18—31.

20. Godel 1975 — Godel R. An introduction to the study of classical Armenian. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1975.

21. Halle, Vaux 1998 — Halle M., Vaux B. Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: The nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. Mír Curad: Studies in honor of Calvert Watkins. Jasanoff J., Melchert H. C., Olivier L. (eds.). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, 1998. S. 223—240.

22. Haspelmath 1993 — Haspelmath M. The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics. 1993. Vol. 31. Pp. 279—309.

23. Haspelmath 1995 — Haspelmath M. The growth of affixes in morphological reanalysis. Yearbook of Morphology 1994. Booij G., van Marle J. (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995. Pp. 1—29.

24. Igartua 2015 — Igartua I. From cumulative to separative exponence in inflection: Reversing the morphological cycle. Language. 2015. Vol. 91. Pp. 676—722.

25. Kortlandt 1984/2003 — Kortlandt F. Proto-Armenian case endings. Armeniaca: Comparative notes. Kortlandt F. Ann Arbor: Caravan Books, 2003. Pp. 45—51.

26. Kortlandt 2010 — Kortlandt F. An outline of Proto-Indo-European. Studies in Germanic, Indo-European and Indo-Uralic. Kortlandt F. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010. Pp. 37—45.

27. Kulikov 2012 — Kulikov L. I. The Proto-Indo-European case system and its reflexes in a diachronic typological perspective: Evidence for the linguistic prehistory of Eurasia. Rivista degli Studi Orientali. 2012. Vol. 84. Pp. 289—309.

28. de Lamberterie 1979 — de Lamberterie Ch. Le signe du pluriel en arménien classique. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. 1979. Vol. 74. Pp. 319—332.

29. de Lamberterie 1992 — de Lamberterie Ch. Introduction à l’arménien classique. LALIES. 1992. Vol. 10. Pp. 234—289.

30. de Lamberterie 1993 — de Lamberterie Ch. Le pluriel en arménien classique. Faits de langues. 1993. No. 2. Pp. 161—167.

31. de Lamberterie 2005 — de Lamberterie Ch. Le verbe arménien unim / kalay. Indogermanica — Festschrift Gert Klingenschmitt: Indische, iranische und indogermanische Studien dem verehrten Jubilar dargebracht zu seinem fünfundsechzigsten Geburtstag. Schweiger G. (Hrsg.). Taimering (Riekofen): Schweiger VWT, 2005. S. 333—358.

32. Martirosyan 2013 — Martirosyan H. 2013. The place of Armenian in the Indo-European language family: The relationship with Greek and Indo-Iranian. Journal of language relationship / Вопросы языкового родства. Vol. 10. Pp. 85—137.

33. Matzinger 2005 — Matzinger J. Untersuchungen zum altarmenischen Nomen: die Flexion des Substantivs. Dettelbach: Röll, 2005.

34. Meillet 1936 — Meillet A. Esquisse d’une grammaire comparée de l’arménien classique. 2me éd. Wien: Mechitharisten, 1936.

35. Norde 2001 — Norde M. Deflexion as a counterdirectional factor in grammatical change. Language Sciences. 2001. Vol. 23. Pp. 231—264.

36. Olsen 1999 — Olsen B. A. The noun in Biblical Armenian: Origin and word-formation — with special emphasis on the Indo-European heritage. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.

37. Schmidt 1987 — Schmidt K. H. The Indo-European background of the Classical Armenian noun declension. Annual of Armenian linguistics. 1987. Vol. 8. Pp. 35—47.

38. Tollis 2010 — Tollis F. La déflexivité romane et la personne dans les écrits publiés de Gustave Guillaume (domaine nominal). Langages. 2010. Vol. 178. No. 2. Pp. 21—42.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate