INTERRELATION BETWEEN WORK INTERESTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR OF EMPLOYEES
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
INTERRELATION BETWEEN WORK INTERESTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR OF EMPLOYEES
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000516-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
New classification grounds for assigning of characteristics and types of interests are proposed, the typology of interests actual for employees is offered. Structural model of employee’s interests that can be used for researches in organizations by managers and by psychologists as well is presented. Socio-psychological aspects of contradictions in employees interests in organization are analyzed (N = 130), correlations between interests and efficiency of work activity are revealed (N = 30). Contradictions between different groups (intergroup, corporative) and contradictions between corporative and civil interests are considered as the most significant types of contradictions. The designation of work’s perspectives, stimulation of creativity, complexification of the work due to new tasks’ developing, conformation of feeling of success on-stream, creation of comfortable conditions for development are specified as the way to form stably useful and socially significant employees’ interests.
Keywords
Interest, motive, motivation, organization, organizational behavior, work interests, work satisfaction, efficiency of activity, needs
Date of publication
03.03.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
551
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Amabile T., Kramer S. Chto obschego u prostykh smertnykh i geniev? // Harvard Business Review- Rossiya. 2011. № 8.
  2. Goncharova A.N. Problema soglasovaniya obschestvennykh i lichnykh interesov v protsesse postroeniya grazhdanskogo obschestva: Monografiya. Krasnoyarskij gos. un-t. Krasnoyarsk, 2001.
  3. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. Psikhologiya upravleniya sovmestnoj deyatel'nost'yu. Novye napravleniya issledovanij. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2010.
  4. Zdravomyslov A.G. Interes // Filosofskij ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya, 1983. S. 213-214.
  5. Zdravomyslov A.G. Potrebnosti. Interesy. Tsennosti. M., 1986.
  6. Izard K.E. Ehmotsii cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1980.
  7. Il'in E.P. Motivatsiya i motivy. SPb.: Piter, 2002.
  8. Kazakov Yu.N., Zolotareva G.K. Obschaya psikhologiya. "Vvedenie v psikhologiyu". URL: http://psylib. myword.ru/index.php?automodule=downloads&show file=1391 (data obrascheniya 28.11.2014).
  9. Lobanova T.N. Motivy dolzhnostnykh peremeschenij mezhdu urovnyami upravleniya // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2013. № 4. S.131-142.
  10. Narskij I.S. Dialekticheskoe protivorechie i logika poznaniya. M., 1969.
  11. Pryazhnikov N.S. Metody aktivizatsii professional'nogo i lichnostnogo samoopredeleniya. M.: NPO MODEhK, 2003.
  12. Rubinshtejn S.L. Osnovy obschej psikhologii. (Seriya “Mastera psikhologii”). Glava XV. SPb.: Piter, 2002.
  13. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Povedencheskij mekhanizm dejstviya prava // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2011. № 4. S. 92-105.
  14. AON Hewitt. Best employers. URL:https://ceplb03. hewitt.com/bestemployers/canada/pages/emp_ engagement.htm (data obrascheniya 28.11.2014).
  15. Gallup. Engagement at Work: Its Effect on Performance Continues in Tough Economic Times. URL: http:// www.gallup.com/services/176657/engagement-work- effect-performance-continues-tough-economic-times. aspx (data obrascheniya 28.11.2014).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate