Везде
SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY AS A SUBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY AS A SUBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000408-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
O. Аrtem'eva 
Abstract
The problem of science’s social responsibility is emphasized. The subject approach to its solving as well as theoretical and methodological basis for its realization is proposed. Based on analysis of philosophical, psychology of science, general and social psychology works, subjectity criteria are marked out. Characteristics of pre-subjectity, becoming and developed stages of collective scientific subject activity are given on the material of Russian psychology of the first half of the XX century. Possibility to solve the problem of science social responsibility when scientific community achieves the stage of developed subject is grounded.
Keywords
Scientific community, collective subject of scientific activity, social responsibility of science, history of psychology
Date of publication
03.09.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
518
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Abul'khanova K.A. Rubinshtejnovskaya kategoriya sub'ekta i ee razlichnye metodologicheskie znacheniya // Psikhologiya individual'nogo i gruppovogo sub'ekta / Pod red. A.V. Brushlinskogo, M.I. Volovikovoj. M.: Per Seh, 2002. S. 34-51.
    2. 

  2. Abul'khanova K.A. Printsip sub'ekta v otechestvennoj psikhologii // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2005. T. 2. № 4. S. 3-21.
    3. 

  3. Allakhverdyan A.G., Moshkova G.Yu., Yurevich A.V., Yaroshevskij M.G. Psikhologiya nauki. M.: Mosk. psikhol.-sots. in-t; Flinta, 1998.
    4. 

  4. Artem'eva O.A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya determinatsiya otechestvennoj psikhologii kak stanovlenie i razvitie kollektivnogo sub'ekta nauchnoj deyatel'nosti v pervoj polovine KhKh stoletiya: avtoreferat diss.. doktora psikhol. nauk. M., 2013.
    5. 

  5. Brushlinskij A.V. O kriteriyakh sub'ekta // Psikhologiya individual'nogo i gruppovogo sub'ekta/ Pod red. A.V. Brushlinskogo, M.I. Volovikovoj. M.: Per Seh, 2002. S. 9-34.
    6. 

  6. Gajdar K.M. Sistematizatsiya svojstv gruppovogo sub'ekta// Razvitie psikhologii v sisteme kompleksnogo chelovekoznaniya. Ch. 1 / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, V. A. Kol'tsova. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2012. S. 456-462.
    7. 

  7. Dontsov A.I. K probleme tselostnosti sub'ekta kollektivnoj deyatel'nosti // Vopr. psikhologii. 1979. № 3. S. 25-34.
    8. 

  8. Dontsov A.I., Dubovskaya E.M., Ulanovskaya I.M. Razrabotka kriteriev analiza sovmestnoj deyatel'nosti // Vopr. psikhologii. 1998. № 2. S. 61-71.  
    9. 

  9. Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti kollektivnogo sub'ekta // Problema sub'ekta v psikhologicheskoj nauke / Otv. red. A.V. Brushlinskij, M.I. Volovikova, V. N. Druzhinin. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2000. S. 133-151.
    10. 

  10. Zhuravlev A.L. Kollektivnyj sub'ekt: osnovnye priznaki, urovni i psikhologicheskie tipy // Psikhol. zhurn. 2009. T. 30. № 5. S. 72-80.
    11. 

  11. Kartsev V.P. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya nauki i problemy istoriko-nauchnykh issledovanij. M.: Nauka, 1984.
    12. 

  12. Krichevskij R.L. Motivatsionnyj potentsial rukovoditelya kak faktor motivatsii gruppovoj deyatel'nosti i udovletvorennosti podchinennykh gruppovym chlenstvom // Nov. issled. v psikhologii. 1974. № 1 (9). S. 11-18.
    13. 

  13. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsij. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Progress, 1977.
    14. 

  14. Mazurina O.A. Nauchnoe soobschestvo v kontekste sotsiokul'turnoj dinamiki: sotsial'no-filosofskij analiz: Diss.. kand. filos. nauk. Tomsk, 2008.
    15. 

  15. Maksimova N.E., Aleksandrov I.O., Tikhomirova I.V., Filippova I.V., Fomicheva L.F. Struktura i aktualgenez sub'ekta s pozitsij sistemno-ehvolyutsionnogo podkhoda // Psikhol. zhurn. 2004. T. 25. № 1. S. 17-40.
    16. 

  16. Mironova N.B. Nauchnoe soobschestvo kak kollektivnyj sub'ekt poznaniya: Avtoref. diss.. kand. filos. nauk. M., 1983.
    17. 

  17. Mirskij Eh.M. Organizatsiya znanij i samoorganizatsiya nauchnogo soobschestva: avtoref. diss.. dokt. filos. nauk. M., 1996.
    18. 

  18. Petrovskij A.V., Shpalinskij V.V. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya kollektiva. M.: Prosveschenie, 1978.
    19. 

  19. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie: Na puti k post-kriticheskoj filosofii. M.: Progress, 1985.   
    20. 

  20. Rubinshtejn S.L. Chelovek i mir. M.: Nauka, 1997.
    21. 

  21. Rubtsov V.V. Organizatsiya i razvitie sovmestnykh dejstvij u detej v protsesse obucheniya. M.: Pedagogika, 1987.
    22. 

  22. Sergienko E.A. Sistemno-sub'ektnyj podkhod: obosnovanie i perspektiva // Psikhol. zhurn. 2011. T. 32. № 1. S. 120-132.
    23. 

  23. Umanskij L.I. Psikhologiya organizatorskoj deyatel'nosti shkol'nikov. M.: Prosveschenie, 1980.
    24. 

  24. Flek L. Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: Vvedenie v teoriyu stilya myshleniya i myslitel'nogo kollektiva. M.: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noj knigi, 1999.
    25. 

  25. Khalanchuk L.L. Nauchno-tekhnicheskoe soobschestvo kak sub'ekt poznavatel'noj i inzhenernoj deyatel'nosti: diss.. kand. filos. nauk. Tomsk, 1986.
    26. 

  26. Chechulin A.A. Mikrosreda v sisteme sotsial'nykh svyazej i otnoshenij uchenogo. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1989.
    27. 

  27. Yurevich A.V. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya nauchnoj deyatel'nosti. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013.
    28. 

  28. Yurevich A.V., Tsapenko I.P. Nauka v sovremennom rossijskom obschestve. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2010.
    29. 

  29. Yaroshevskij M.G. O genezise sub'ekta nauchnogo poznaniya // Vopr. filosofii. 1979. № 6. S. 68-80.
    30. 

  30. Yaroshevskij M.G. Rukovoditel' v rolevoj strukture pervichnogo kollektiva // Problemy rukovodstva nauchnym kollektivom: Opyt sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya / Pod red. M.G. Yaroshevskogo. M.: Nauka, 1982. S. 50-73.
    31. 

  31. Haas P.M. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination // International Organization. 1992. Vol. 46. № 1. P. 1-35.
    32. 

  32. Hackett E.J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., Wajcman J., Barben D., Fisher E., Selin C., Guston D.H. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration // The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies / Eds. E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, J. Wajcman. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. P. 979-1000.
    33. 

  33. Nowotny H. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge // Science & Public Policy. 2003. № 30(3). P. 151-156.
    34. 

  34. Stilgoe J., Simon J.L., Wilsdon J. Why should we promote public engagement with science? // Public Understanding of Science. 2014. №23(1). R. 4-15.
    35. 

  35. Webster A. Reflections on Reflexive Engagement: Response to Nowotny and Wynne // Science, Technology and Human Values. 2007. № 32(5). R 608-615.
    36.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate