Везде
HOME AS A CATEGORY OF PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
HOME AS A CATEGORY OF PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000408-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. Bochaver 
Abstract
Interdisciplinary study of subjective conception of home as an element of personal experience is described. Based on environmental approach and statements about subjective and social character of home conception, recent empirical researches of living environment, methodology of A. Maslow's motivation theory, cognitive theory of metaphor by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, as well as on empirical data analysis, four components of home conception existing in respondents' personal experience that actualize different categories of needs are characterized. Fundamental, core ideas of home as a place for secure living and family maintenance constitute universal image of home. Everyday image of home describes possibility for interaction with nears and dears, creation of comfortable everyday life and reflects subjective understanding of comfort. Dynamic image of home gives possibilities for self-changing through reconstruction of home space - control of emotional state and cognitive mood, appealing to family and personal history, broadening of repertoire of habitual kinds of activity, acquiring skills and realization of possibilities. Image of imaginary home is a pragmatic conception about the most comfortable physical environment for own life style's realization. All components have psychotherapeutic potential that can be actualized at different stages of ontogenesis and in different situations. Study of psychology of home is prospective from practical psychology, psychology of environment and psychology of personality perspectives.
Keywords
Home, psychology of home, psychology of environment, subjective conception of home
Date of publication
03.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
565
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000408-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Bochaver A.A. Metafora kak sposob vnutrennej reprezentatsii zhiznennogo puti lichnosti: Avtoreferat diss.. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2010.
    2. 

  2. Dmitrieva N.S. Model' zhiznennogo prostranstva u podrostkov: predposylki i napravleniya issledovaniya//Aktual'nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya. 2013. № 3. S. 90-98.
    3. 

  3. Dmitrieva N.S., Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Vozmozhnosti fizicheskoj sredy v usloviyakh inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya//Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2014. T. 19. № 1. S.74-81.  
    4. 

  4. Zaslavskij A.A., Prigarina T.A. Otsenka soglasovannosti sub'ektivnykh klassifikatsij pri zadannykh klassakh//Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskie modeli. 1994. № 3-4. S. 84-109.
    5. 

  5. Kovalenko E.A. Voronka bezdomnosti i ogranichenie potentsial'nykh vozmozhnostej//Zhurn. issledovanij sotsial'noj politiki. 2010. T. 8. № 4. S. 519-536.
    6. 

  6. Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. M.: URSS, 1982.
    7. 

  7. Maslou A.G. Motivatsiya i lichnost'. SPb.: Piter, 2014.
    8. 

  8. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Ponyatie “psikhologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti”: obosnovanie i prikladnoe znachenie//Psikhol. zhurn. 2003. T. 24. № 6. S. 27-36.
    9. 

  9. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Psikhologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti. M.: Prometej, 2005.
    10. 

  10. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Teoriya privatnosti kak napravlenie zarubezhnoj psikhologii//Psikhol. zhurn. 2006. T. 27. № 5. C. 28-39.
    11. 

  11. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Fizicheskaya shkol'naya sreda kak prediktor zdorov'ya i blagopoluchiya sub'ektov obrazovatel'nogo protsessa (obzor zarubezhnykh issledovanij)//Klinicheskaya i spetsial'naya psikhologiya. 2012. № 1. S. 39-50.
    12. 

  12. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Bochaver K.A., Bochaver S.Yu. Zhiznennoe prostranstvo sem'i: ob'edinenie i razdelenie. M.: Genezis, 2011.
    13. 

  13. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Dmitrieva N.S., Reznichenko S.I., Kuznetsova V.B., Braginets E.I. Metod otsenki druzhestvennosti zhilischa: oprosnik “Funktsional'nost' domashnej sredy”//Psikhol. zhurn. 2015. T. 36. № 4. S. 71-83.
    14. 

  14. Reznichenko S.I. Privyazannost' k mestu i chuvstvo mesta: modeli i fenomeny//Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obschestvo. 2014. T. 5. № 3. S. 15-26.
    15. 

  15. Reznichenko S.I. Mekhanizmy privyazannosti k zhilomu prostranstvu u detej mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta//Aktual'nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya. 2013. № 2. S. 24-39.
    16. 

  16. Ahmed S., Castaneda C., Fortier A., Shelter M. Uprootings/Regroundings: Questions of Home and Migration. New York: Berg Publishers, 2003.
    17. 

  17. Altman I., Low S.M. Place Attachment (Human Behavior and Environment). New York: Plenum, 1992.
    18. 

  18. Easthope H. A place called home//Housing, Theory and Society. 2004. V. 21. N 3. P. 128-138.
    19. 

  19. Gieryn T.A. Space for Place in Sociology//Annual Review of Sociology. 2000. V. 26. P. 463-496.
    20. 

  20. Graaf van der P.F. Out of place? Emotional ties to the neighbourhood in urban renewal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (Dissertation). Amsterdam, 2009.
    21. 

  21. Gustafson P.E.R. Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualisations//Journ. of Environmental Psychology. 2001. V. 21. № 1.
    22. 

  22. Harvey D. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1996. P. 210-247.
    23. 

  23. Manzo L. Beyond house and haven: a revisioning of emotional relationships with places//Journ. of Environmental Psychology. 2003. V. 23. P. 47-61.
    24. 

  24. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook -second edition. London: Sage, 1994.
    25. 

  25. Raymond C., Brown G., Weber D. The measurement of place attachment: personal, community, and environmental connections//Journ. of Environmental Psychology. 2010. V. 30. P. 422-434.
    26. 

  26. Rose G. Place and identity: a sense of place//A Place in the World: Places, Cultures and Globalization/Eds. D. Massey and P. Jess. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. P. 87-132.
    27. 

  27. Tuan Y.F. Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
    28. 

  28. Tuan Y.F. Rootedness versus sense of place//Landscape. 1980. V. 24. P. 3-8.
    29. 

  29. Tuan Y. Introduction: Cosmos versus Hearth, in P. Adams, S. Hoelscher and K. Till (eds) Textures of Place: Exploring Humanist Geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001. P. 319-325.
    30. 

  30. Zhang N. Home divided, home reconstructed: children in rural-urban migration in contemporary China//Children's Geographies. 2013. P. 1-17.
    31.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate